Many employment contracts limit what an employee gets on termination. But a termination clause has to follow the Employment Standards Act (ESA) in every respect. If any part of it falls short, a court can strike the whole clause and award reasonable notice at common law, which is often much greater.
Employers and employees cannot contract out of the ESA. A clause that tries to give you less than the Act, even in one scenario, is unlawful. Courts read termination provisions as a whole, so one bad part can undo the rest.
In Waksdale, the Court of Appeal found that a for-cause provision breached the ESA because it denied notice for conduct that was less than wilful misconduct. It held that, because the contract had to be read as a whole, the invalid for-cause clause meant the without-cause clause could not be enforced either. The employee was entitled to reasonable notice at common law. Later cases have applied this approach, and courts continue to look at how clauses are worded.
Have employment contracts reviewed regularly. Use clear wording that meets or beats the ESA in all circumstances, avoid for-cause language that goes beyond the ESA, and update templates after changes in the law.
It depends on the exact wording and the whole termination section. Many such clauses have been struck down. A review is the only reliable way to know.
Yes, for claims within the Small Claims Court limit. Larger claims are usually brought in the Superior Court by a lawyer.
This guide is general information for people in Ontario, not legal advice. Rules, forms and deadlines change, and every situation is different. Check the current rule or speak to a licensed legal professional before you act.
Not sure where you stand? A licensed paralegal can look at your documents and tell you your options.
Book a Free Consultation