If you challenge a tribunal or government decision in court, Vavilov tells you what the court will look for. Here is the framework, in plain language.

Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, is the Supreme Court of Canada's leading decision on judicial review: how courts review decisions made by tribunals and government officials.
Courts usually ask whether a decision was reasonable: whether it is justified, transparent and intelligible, given the facts and the law. Some questions, such as constitutional issues, get a stricter "correctness" review.

Alexander Vavilov was born in Toronto. His parents, it later turned out, were Russian spies living under false Canadian identities. The Registrar of Citizenship cancelled his citizenship, relying on an exception for children of foreign government employees. The Supreme Court held the decision was unreasonable: the exception didn't apply to him.
A reasonable decision:
Wondering how a decision like this applies to your situation? NEO can review your facts and explain your options. Call 647-200-3526 or toll-free 888-519-2435, email info@neolegalservices.com, or book a free consultation.
Read next: Baker v. Canada: Your Right to a Fair Process
General Ontario legal information, not legal advice for your matter, and reading it does not create a retainer. Sources checked 15 October 2026: check the current law, forms and dates before you act.
Photos from Pexels: The Peace Tower on Parliament Hill · Holding a passport with travel documents.
This article is general information for people in Ontario, not legal advice. Rules, forms and deadlines change, and every situation is different. Check the current rule or speak to a licensed legal professional before you act.
Not sure where you stand? A licensed paralegal can look at your documents and tell you your options.
Book a Free ConsultationLoading comments…