Government decisions that affect you must be made fairly. Baker v. Canada sets out what fairness requires, and when.

Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817, is the Supreme Court of Canada's leading case on procedural fairness: the right to a fair process when a government body or tribunal makes a decision that affects you.
How much fairness you are owed depends on the decision. Important decisions can require a chance to be heard, written reasons and an unbiased decision-maker.

Mavis Baker, a Jamaican citizen, had lived in Canada for years and had four Canadian-born children. She was ordered deported and applied to stay on humanitarian and compassionate grounds. Her application was refused. The officer's notes contained stereotyped comments about her.
The Supreme Court set aside the decision. It held:
How much fairness is required depends on:
At a tribunal or with a government decision, you may have a right to see the case against you, respond to it, and get reasons. If those rights were ignored, you may be able to challenge the decision.
Wondering how a decision like this applies to your situation? NEO can review your facts and explain your options. Call 647-200-3526 or toll-free 888-519-2435, email info@neolegalservices.com, or book a free consultation.
Read next: Meiorin: When Is a Job Standard Discriminatory?
General Ontario legal information, not legal advice for your matter, and reading it does not create a retainer. Sources checked 15 October 2026: check the current law, forms and dates before you act.
Photos from Pexels: Holding a passport with travel documents · A family walking on a wooden bridge.
This article is general information for people in Ontario, not legal advice. Rules, forms and deadlines change, and every situation is different. Check the current rule or speak to a licensed legal professional before you act.
Not sure where you stand? A licensed paralegal can look at your documents and tell you your options.
Book a Free ConsultationLoading comments…