Canadian defamation law balances your right to a good name with everyone's right to speak on public issues. These two cases set that balance.

Two Supreme Court of Canada decisions are central to defamation law in Ontario: Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto (1995) and Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61.
Canada gives real weight to reputation (Hill), but also protects responsible reporting on matters of public interest, even if it turns out to be wrong (Grant).

At a press conference, a lawyer and the Church of Scientology made false allegations that a Crown attorney, Casey Hill, had misled a judge. A jury awarded record damages. The Supreme Court upheld the award and refused to adopt the U.S. "actual malice" rule, which makes it much harder for public figures to sue. Reputation, it said, deserves protection too.
The Toronto Star published a story about a proposed private golf course and quoted residents' allegations about its developer, Peter Grant. The Supreme Court created a new defence: responsible communication on matters of public interest. A publisher can rely on it if:
Wondering how a decision like this applies to your situation? NEO can review your facts and explain your options. Call 647-200-3526 or toll-free 888-519-2435, email info@neolegalservices.com, or book a free consultation.
Read next: Pointes Protection: How Ontario's Anti-SLAPP Law Works
General Ontario legal information, not legal advice for your matter, and reading it does not create a retainer. Sources checked 15 October 2026: check the current law, forms and dates before you act.
Photos from Pexels: Rubber stamps on a wooden table · Law books on a library shelf.
This article is general information for people in Ontario, not legal advice. Rules, forms and deadlines change, and every situation is different. Check the current rule or speak to a licensed legal professional before you act.
Not sure where you stand? A licensed paralegal can look at your documents and tell you your options.
Book a Free ConsultationLoading comments…